Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Tennessee Personal Injury Lawyer
Hablamos Español Local 865-500-HURT Toll Free 866-862-4855
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

The Open And Obvious Doctrine In Slip And Fall Cases

SlipFall9

Can a victim sue for injuries in a slip and fall where the victim fell over something that they could have seen and should have avoided? This is the question which arises in cases that involve the open and obvious doctrine.

What is an Open and Obvious Condition?

As the name implies, the open and obvious doctrine says that a victim can’t recover for a fall where the fall was caused by a condition that was out in the open and obvious to anybody who used due care and was looking where they were going.

Certainly, if something like a curb exists, and the curb is painted in a bright color, someone who falls over it would have a hard time suing. As you can imagine, curbs or steps or other natural imperfections in the areas we walk are commonplace, and people can’t sue for every time a sidewalk isn’t exactly even or there is a step down from a curb.

Not So Obvious Conditions

But often, there are open and obvious conditions which end up being not so open or obvious.

For example, imagine someone who falls on a brightly colored liquid inside a store. At first glance, that may be an open and obvious condition – the victim should have seen, and avoided, the area. But now imagine that the store had large “for sale” signs on the shelves, or a bright, large display. The store’s intention is to get your eyes to look at the sale or the display. Now, the condition on the floor, though normally open and obvious, is not so obvious, because of a condition created by the store owner.

Often, when it comes to substances, the question is whether the substance “blends in” with the flooring underneath. Ketchup on a white floor would be more likely to be open and obvious than salt on a white floor would be.

Liability Even Where a Condition is Obvious

Even with an open and obvious condition, and even where a victim was aware of the condition, a landowner can still be liable to someone who is injured on the property. That’s because Tennessee courts will look to whether an injury is foreseeable, and what the cost to the landowner of remedying the situation is.

Let’s assume that a property owner knows that there is a ledge with a large drop off outside its property. It is foreseeable that anybody could fall off that ledge, especially if the area is one where foot traffic is supposed to walk or is directed. All that it would take to make the area safer, is a relatively inexpensive handrail.

In that kind of case, even though the condition was open and obvious, the victim could still recover damages.

Are you injured because of a fall? Call the Clinton personal injury attorneys at Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, for help today.

Resource:

scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1350&context=mulr

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Segment Pixel