Close Menu
Tennessee Personal Injury Lawyer
Hablamos Español Local 865-457-6440 Toll Free 866-862-4855
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Ohio Judge Allows Opioid Lawsuit Against Insys to Proceed

Opioid3

The continuing opioid crisis raises a number of complicated legal issues. Every state, including Tennessee, has strict product liability laws. But prescription drugs, which include many popular opioids, are also subject to federal regulation. So what happens when an victim seeks to hold opioid manufacturers responsible under state laws that may conflict with federal statutes?

Federal Law Does Not Preempt Certain State Law Claims

A federal judge in Ohio recently addressed such a scenario. The plaintiff in this lawsuit, Kelley v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc., became addicted to (and overdosed on) Subsys–a powerful fentanyl-based opioid–after his doctor prescribed it to manage the plaintiff’s chronic knee and back pain. Subsys was actually designed to help cancer patients manage their pain. But Subsys also marketed the drug for “off-label” use in other patients such as the plaintiff to deal with other forms of pain.

The plaintiff’s lawsuit effectively alleges the manufacturers of Subsys violated Ohio products liability law. In response, the defendants argued federal law “preempted” any state law claims arising from the use of Subsys. Specifically, the defendants cited the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). This law states that only the federal government, rather than individual plaintiffs, may pursue claims arising from the use of FDA-regulated drugs. Here, the defense maintained that any claims based on the “off-label” use of Subsys fell within the scope of the FDCA’s preemption.

The judge overseeing the case partially agreed. The court held that “any claim based solely on off-label promotion is impliedly preempted” by the FDCA. But “independent state law grounds” could still support a product liability claim. In this case, there was independent grounds to support some–but not all–of the plaintiff’s claims.

More precisely, the judge said the plaintiff could pursue the following claims:

  • The defendants engaged in negligent misrepresentation.The FDCA covers the mere promotion of a drug’s off-label use. But it does not preempt allegations that a pharmaceutical company “misrepresented the risks associated with off-label opioid use.” Here, the plaintiff alleged the defendants “willfully deceived” himself and other patients about the risks associated with Subsys.
  • The defendants’ defectively designed Subsys. All companies have a legal obligation to “refrain from selling a product that is … unreasonably dangerous.” In this case, the plaintiff alleged Subsys was defectively designed and unsafe to the point where it “caused serious injuries” to himself and others. Again, the judge said such claims went beyond arguing the defendants promoted Subsys for off-label use.

Speak with a Tennessee Opioid Attorney Today

Every day we learn about more people whose lives have been destroyed by opioid addiction. It is critical to hold the companies responsible for this crisis accountable. If you, or someone you love, has been harmed due to opioid usage, it is critical to promptly seek legal advice. The qualified Tennessee opioid attorneys at Fox & Farley can sit down, review your case, and apprise of your options. Call us at (866) 862-4855 to schedule a confidential case evaluation today.

https://www.foxandfarleylaw.com/should-the-owners-of-opioid-manufacturers-face-criminal-charges/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus
Segment Pixel