Fox & Farley, Attorneys at Law
Placeholder Groupshot Groupshot Groupshot Bruce D. Fox Attorney Attorney Groupshot Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorneys Attorney Groupshot Groupshot Attorney and Award-Winning Dog

We change people's lives in Greater Knoxville and Statewide

What if multiple people caused my car accident?

traffic accident

Not all multi-vehicle car accidents are the result of just two cars. Sometimes more than one driver can be at fault for your injuries. Take as an example an accident that happens when you are legally moving through an intersection and another driver makes an improper turn in front of you, causing a collision. Another driver who was following you too closely fails to react in time to the accident and hits the rear of your vehicle. You suffer neck, shoulder and back injuries. How does Tennessee law treat the liability of the other two drivers?

It used to be that the doctrine of joint and several liability applied to accidents such as this one. This allowed a plaintiff to collect all or part of damages from any of multiple defendants without consideration to their relative share of blame. But at the same time that the Tennessee Supreme Court switched from the doctrine of contributory negligence to comparative fault it also rendered joint and several liability obsolete except for a limited number of circumstances. Today in a situation such as our car accident example, if you sued both of the other drivers they would be liable to you severally, but not jointly.

Thus, if your claim went to trial and you won, the court would apportion your damages award along the following lines:

  1. If the jury found you to be partially to blame, but less than 50 percent so, then your award would be reduced by the percentage of blame that the jury assigned to you (assume for our example that the jury found you to be 10 percent at fault because you were moving through the intersection at a speed slightly faster than the speed limit).
  2. Each of the other drivers would be severally (separately) liable for the remaining 90 percent of the blame, based on the percentage that the jury would assign to each. It might apportion 60 percent to the driver who made the improper turn, and 30 percent to the driver who rear-ended you. Under the old doctrine of joint and several liability you could have sought the entire amount of your award against either driver, but now under the comparative fault system the negligent parties cannot be held responsible to pay more than their assigned percentage based on how much at fault they were.
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus
MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2017 Fox & Farley, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab