Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette Attorneys At Law
  • Hablamos Español

Is a Truck Driver Liable for Hitting a Pedestrian Lying in the Road?

Pedest5

Every parent has told their child, “Look both ways before you cross the street.” There’s good reason for this advice: Pedestrian accidents are among the most serious categories of motor vehicle collisions. But avoiding accidents is not just the pedestrian’s responsibility. In fact, Tennessee law expressly imposes a duty on all motorists to “exercise due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon any roadway.”

Judge Rejects Nashville Government’s “Absurd” Argument

While this law may sound straightforward, creative defense attorneys know how to try and carve out exceptions for their clients. For example, lawyers representing the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro) recently argued before a federal judge that a person run over by one of its trucks was not a “pedestrian” because, at the time of the accident, he was already lying on the ground and not “on his feet.”

If this argument sounds absurd, the actual context of is downright tragic. Prior to the truck collision, the plaintiff, a homeless man from California, and a friend approached a Nashville convenience store. Before they reached the store’s entrance, a gang confronted them in an attempt to sell them illegal narcotics. When the plaintiff said he wasn’t interested in drugs, the gang tried to rob him and his friend at gunpoint. The plaintiff refused to give the gang members any money, whereupon he was chased, hit and the face with a rock, and left lying unconscious in the middle of the road.

As the plaintiff started to regain consciousness, a tow truck owned by Metro struck him. As a result of this collision, the plaintiff was rendered a paraplegic. He subsequently sued Metro and other parties for damages.

Metro moved for summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff could not prove the tow truck driver’s negligence. A key element of negligence is establishing the defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty. Here, the plaintiff cited Tennessee law, which as noted above requires “due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon any roadway.” Metro argued that since the plaintiff was already lying in the road, he did not qualify as a “pedestrian.”

U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh said this was a novel legal issue not previously addressed by the Tennessee state courts. He determined that under the facts of this case, the “Plaintiff was a pedestrian within the meaning of the statute and that Plaintiff is still owed a duty from [the tow truck driver] even though Plaintiff was not legally in a crosswalk.” It would be “absurd,” the judge said, to hold the plaintiff was not protected by law merely because “he was chased, robbed, and knocked unconscious by third parties.” Accordingly, the judge denied Metro’s request for summary judgment.

Contact a Clinton Truck Accident Lawyer Today

Sorting out liability for a pedestrian accident is often a complicated process, especially if multiple defendants are involved. This is why it is important to work with an experienced Clinton personal injury lawyer who understands the legal system and will effectively represent your interests. Contact the offices of Fox, Farley, Willis & Burnette, Attorneys at Law, if you need help with an accident-related claim today.

Source:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6976816184954561584

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Our Offices

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation