Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette Attorneys At Law
  • Hablamos Español

Maryville Negligent Security Lawyer

If you have been the victim of a crime that occurred on another person’s property, you may have a negligent security claim. Tennessee law requires property owners to take reasonable care so visitors to their premises do not become hurt. Failing to take this reasonable care is considered negligence and property owners can be held liable for any injury or loss that results. Premises liability law is extremely complex. Our Maryville negligent security lawyer can advise on how the law applies to your case, and help you obtain maximum damages.

Why Sue the Property Owner for Negligent Security?

It is common knowledge that when a person commits a crime, they can be criminally charged. Some people may even know that they can file a civil claim against the offender for their wrongdoing. So, if you can seek damages from the person that hurt you, why sue the property owner as well?

Unfortunately, law enforcement is not always able to successfully find and charge criminals for their wrongdoing. If the individual who hurt you remains at large, it is impossible to file a claim against them. Additionally, there is a good chance that the criminal is insolvent and does not have the ability to pay you the full damages you deserve. As such, filing a claim against the property owner for negligent security is often the best way to receive compensation.

What You Must Prove in Your Negligent Security Claim

When you file a lawsuit against a property owner, there are several elements of your claim you must prove. These are as follows:

  • The accident occurred while you were legally allowed on the defendant’s property
  • The defendant owed you a duty of reasonable care to ensure they had sufficient security measures
  • The defendant breached their duty by failing to enact sufficient security measures
  • The injuries you suffered were foreseeable
  • The lack of security contributed to your injuries
  • You suffered actual harm as a result

Proving Foreseeability in Your Negligent Security Claim

Negligent security cases are very fact-based. One of the most difficult elements of these cases to prove is that your injuries were foreseeable. To be successful with your claim, you must show the property owner should have been reasonably able to predict that a criminal act resulting in injury could occur. A few of the situations that could help prove foreseeability are as follows:

  • The property owner failed to implement security measures
  • The property owner ignored threats of violence from employees, customers, or patrons
  • The property owner did not provide proper lighting in entrances, exits, or parking lots
  • The property owner did not train staff or employees regarding safety
  • The property owner disregarded multiple acts of violence that occurred on their property
  • The property owner did not run background checks on their employees

The above are just a few scenarios that could prove foreseeability. A Maryville negligent security lawyer can review the facts of your case to prove this important element.

Call Our Negligent Security Lawyer in Maryville Today

If you have been the victim of a criminal act due to another person’s negligence, our Maryville negligent security lawyer wants to help you make it right. At Fox, Farley, Willis & Burnette, our skilled attorneys know the complexities these cases present and will work through them so you obtain the full compensation you deserve. Call us today at 866-862-4855 or contact us online for a free consultation.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Our Offices

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation